AI access report

livescore.cz

Blocks 4 of 24 answer engines, blocks 10 training crawlers, no structured data.

10 failing 2 partial 15 passing Scanned 2 hours ago · 2 scans on record

Reach

34.5 / 40

Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all, in robots.txt, in robots directives, and at the edge.

Readability

19 / 25

Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an extractor can segment.

Structure

8 / 20

Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete facts instead of leaving them to be inferred.

Attribution

1 / 15

Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and cite it under known terms.

Who is allowed to read this site 4 of 24 answer engines blocked

Crawler	Operator	Uses content for	robots.txt	Live request
GPTBot Crawls content that may be used to train OpenAI's generative AI foundation models.	OpenAI	Model training	allowed	served 200
OAI-SearchBot Indexes pages so they can be surfaced and cited in ChatGPT search results, not for training.	OpenAI	Answer index	allowed	served 200
ChatGPT-User Fetches a page when a ChatGPT user or GPT Action asks for it; user-initiated, so robots rules may not apply.	OpenAI	Live retrieval	allowed	not probed
OAI-AdsBot Visits pages submitted as ChatGPT ads to check policy compliance and ad relevance; not used for model training.	OpenAI	Live retrieval	allowed	not probed
ClaudeBot Collects web content that may contribute to training Anthropic's models; honors Crawl-delay.	Anthropic	Model training	allowed	served 200
Claude-User Retrieves pages on demand when a Claude user's question needs live web content.	Anthropic	Live retrieval	allowed	not probed
Claude-SearchBot Indexes content to improve the relevance and accuracy of Claude's search results.	Anthropic	Answer index	allowed	not probed
anthropic-ai Legacy token widely blocked for Anthropic training; Anthropic now documents ClaudeBot, Claude-User and Claude-SearchBot.	Anthropic	Model training	allowed	not probed
Google-Extended Control token with no user agent of its own; governs Gemini training and grounding use of Googlebot data.	Google	Model training	allowed	not probed
Googlebot Crawls and renders pages for Google Search, Images, Video, News and Discover.	Google	Answer index	allowed	not probed
Googlebot-News Robots token controlling Google News inclusion; crawling itself uses the Googlebot user agents.	Google	Answer index	allowed	not probed
Google-CloudVertexBot Crawls sites at a site owner's request to build Vertex AI agents; no effect on Google Search.	Google	Live retrieval	allowed	not probed
GoogleOther Generic Google crawler used by product teams for one-off fetches such as internal research and development.	Google	Model training	allowed	not probed
Applebot Crawls for Siri, Spotlight and Safari search; falls back to Googlebot rules and ignores Crawl-delay.	Apple	Answer index	allowed	not probed
Applebot-Extended Control token with no user agent; disallowing it excludes crawled content from Apple foundation model training.	Apple	Model training	allowed	not probed
Bingbot Indexes pages for Bing search and the Copilot answers that are grounded in the Bing index.	Microsoft	Answer index	allowed	not probed
msnbot Legacy Microsoft search crawler token still honored alongside bingbot.	Microsoft	Answer index	allowed	not probed
PerplexityBot Indexes and links pages in Perplexity search results; not used to collect foundation model training data.	Perplexity	Answer index	allowed	served 200
Perplexity-User ignores robots Fetches a page for a specific user question; Perplexity documents that it generally ignores robots.txt.	Perplexity	Live retrieval	allowed	not probed
Meta-ExternalAgent Crawls the web to train Meta's foundation AI models and to index content directly into products.	Meta	Model training	blocked Disallow: /	not probed
Meta-ExternalFetcher ignores robots Fetches individual links for agentic AI tasks; Meta documents that it may bypass robots.txt.	Meta	Live retrieval	blocked Disallow: /	not probed
FacebookBot Crawls public pages to improve language models behind Meta's speech recognition technology.	Meta	Model training	blocked Disallow: /	not probed
Meta-WebIndexer Indexes pages so Meta AI can cite and link them in its search answers.	Meta	Answer index	allowed	not probed
Meta-ExternalAds Crawls the web to improve Meta's advertising and other business products and services.	Meta	Model training	allowed	not probed
facebookexternalhit ignores robots Fetches shared links for Facebook, Instagram and Messenger previews; may bypass robots.txt for integrity checks.	Meta	Live retrieval	allowed	not probed
Bytespider ignores robots Downloads content to train ByteDance LLMs and is widely reported to ignore robots.txt directives.	ByteDance	Model training	blocked Disallow: /	not probed
TikTokSpider ignores robots Fetches shared URLs for TikTok link previews and feeds; not expected to follow robots.txt.	ByteDance	Live retrieval	allowed	not probed
Amazonbot Crawls for Amazon product and Alexa answers and may use the content to train Amazon AI models.	Amazon	Model training	allowed	not probed
Amzn-SearchBot Indexes content for Amazon search experiences such as Alexa; does not crawl for generative AI training.	Amazon	Answer index	allowed	not probed
Amzn-User ignores robots Fetches live pages to answer a user's Alexa question; Amazon documents it may not follow all robots.txt rules.	Amazon	Live retrieval	allowed	not probed
CCBot Builds the open Common Crawl web archive, a common source of LLM pretraining corpora.	Common Crawl Foundation	Archive	blocked Disallow: /	not probed
Diffbot Extracts structured page data for Diffbot's knowledge graph, which is licensed to AI customers.	Diffbot	Model training	blocked Disallow: /	not probed
omgili Collects forum, news and blog content that Webz.io sells as web data feeds, including for AI training.	Webz.io	Model training	blocked Disallow: /	not probed
omgilibot Legacy Omgili search crawler token still blocked alongside the current omgili agent.	Webz.io	Model training	blocked Disallow: /	not probed
AI2Bot Collects web text for Ai2's open datasets used to train open language models such as OLMo.	Allen Institute for AI	Model training	blocked Disallow: /	not probed
cohere-ai Retrieves pages to answer user-initiated prompts in Cohere's enterprise AI products.	Cohere	Live retrieval	blocked Disallow: /	not probed
cohere-training-data-crawler Downloads training data for the large language models behind Cohere's enterprise AI products.	Cohere	Model training	allowed	not probed
MistralAI-User Fetches pages on demand so Mistral's Vibe assistant can answer a question with live, cited web content.	Mistral AI	Live retrieval	allowed	not probed
MistralAI-Index Indexes content for Mistral search behind Vibe answers; not used for generative AI training.	Mistral AI	Answer index	allowed	not probed
MistralAI-Training Crawls web content to build datasets for training Mistral's generative AI models.	Mistral AI	Model training	allowed	not probed
DuckAssistBot Crawls pages in real time for DuckDuckGo's cited AI-assisted answers; not used for model training.	DuckDuckGo	Live retrieval	blocked Disallow: /	not probed
YouBot Indexes pages for You.com search results and the AI answers built on that index.	You.com	Answer index	blocked Disallow: /	not probed
PanguBot Collects web content used to train Huawei's PanGu family of large models.	Huawei	Model training	allowed	not probed
Timpibot Crawls pages for Timpi's decentralized index, which is also used as LLM training data.	Timpi	Model training	blocked Disallow: /	not probed
ImagesiftBot Downloads public images plus surrounding text to build ImageSift's searchable image index.	ImageSift (Hive)	Model training	blocked Disallow: /	not probed
Kangaroo Bot Scrapes site content into datasets used to train the Kangaroo LLM.	Kangaroo LLM	Model training	blocked Disallow: /	not probed
SemrushBot-OCOB Crawls pages to feed Semrush's ContentShake AI writing tool.	Semrush	Model training	allowed	not probed
Scrapy Generic scraping framework often used to build AI training datasets; obeys robots.txt only when ROBOTSTXT_OBEY is on.	Zyte (open-source framework)	Model training	allowed	not probed

Two of these columns matter differently. robots.txt is what the site declares. Live request is what actually happened when we sent a real request using that crawler's user agent from a datacentre IP, which is how edge blocking, rate limits and challenge pages show up even when robots.txt looks permissive.

Reach 34.5 / 40

✗

Answer-engine fetchers are blocked, so you cannot be cited

Blocked from citing you: Meta-ExternalFetcher, cohere-ai, DuckAssistBot, YouBot.

Why it matters. Retrieval fetchers (OAI-SearchBot, ChatGPT-User, Claude-User, Claude-SearchBot, PerplexityBot, Perplexity-User) load a page at answer time to quote and link it. When robots.txt disallows them the assistant drops the URL from its candidate set, so the citation goes to a competitor while your training exposure stays exactly the same.
Fix. Separate the two crawler classes in robots.txt instead of blocking by vendor. Allow `OAI-SearchBot` and `ChatGPT-User` (OpenAI retrieval and user-initiated fetches), `Claude-SearchBot` and `Claude-User` (Anthropic retrieval), and `PerplexityBot` and `Perplexity-User`; keep any opt-out you want on `GPTBot`, `ClaudeBot`, `CCBot`, `Google-Extended`, and `Applebot-Extended`. Order does not decide precedence in RFC 9309 parsers, the longest matching rule does, so make the allow rules at least as specific as the disallow rules. Blocking retrieval buys nothing on training, because the training crawlers are separate user agents with separate rules.

# Retrieval and citation fetchers: allowed.
User-agent: OAI-SearchBot
User-agent: ChatGPT-User
User-agent: Claude-SearchBot
User-agent: Claude-User
User-agent: PerplexityBot
User-agent: Perplexity-User
Allow: /

# Training and dataset crawlers: disallowed.
User-agent: GPTBot
User-agent: ClaudeBot
User-agent: CCBot
User-agent: Google-Extended
User-agent: Applebot-Extended
Disallow: /

User-agent: *
Allow: /
Disallow: /checkout

Sitemap: https://example.com/sitemap.xml

Reference

12 pt

Training crawlers are disallowed for this path

Blocked by robots.txt: Meta-ExternalAgent, FacebookBot, Bytespider, Diffbot, omgili, omgilibot, AI2Bot, Timpibot, ImagesiftBot, Kangaroo Bot.

Why it matters. GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and CCBot collect pages into pretraining corpora, and Google-Extended and Applebot-Extended are opt-out tokens that govern whether already-crawled pages may be used for Gemini and Apple Intelligence. Disallowing them removes your text from the corpora models generalise from, which is a policy choice, not a bug.
Fix. Decide this deliberately rather than by inheriting a template. If you want your content in model weights, remove the `Disallow: /` groups for `GPTBot`, `ClaudeBot`, `CCBot`, `Google-Extended`, and `Applebot-Extended`. If you do not, keep those groups but scope them to the paths that matter and leave retrieval fetchers untouched, because `Google-Extended` and `Applebot-Extended` only control training use and never affect search or answer citation. Record the decision somewhere durable so the next robots.txt edit does not silently reverse it.

# Opt out of model training only.
User-agent: GPTBot
User-agent: ClaudeBot
User-agent: CCBot
User-agent: Google-Extended
User-agent: Applebot-Extended
Disallow: /

Reference

8 pt

✓

AI user agents receive the same 200 response as browsers

Live requests as 4 AI user agents were served normally.

6 pt

✓

No blanket disallow applies to this path

The wildcard group does not disallow the entire site.

5 pt

✓

robots.txt served as plain text with a 200 response

robots.txt served, 936 bytes, 20 group(s).

3 pt

✓

No Crawl-delay directive constrains fetchers

No Crawl-delay directive.

2 pt

✓

Page is indexable, with no noindex directive

No noindex directive on the homepage.

2 pt

✓

Full-length snippet extraction is permitted

Snippets are not restricted by meta tags.

1 pt

✓

X-Robots-Tag header is absent or permissive

No restrictive X-Robots-Tag header.

1 pt

Readability 19 / 25

✗

No <main> or <article> element marks the primary content

No <main> or <article> element, so extractors must guess where the content starts.

Why it matters. Boilerplate removers use `<main>` and `<article>` to decide which subtree is the content and which is navigation, promo, and footer. Without a landmark the extractor guesses by text density and often keeps the nav while dropping part of the body.
Fix. Wrap the page's unique content in exactly one `<main>` element, and use `<article>` for each self-contained item inside it. Put navigation in `<nav>`, site chrome in `<header>` and `<footer>`, and tangential blocks in `<aside>` so they are cleanly separable. Do not nest the content inside a `<div>` whose only meaning is a CSS class.

<body>
  <header><nav><!-- site navigation --></nav></header>
  <main>
    <article>
      <h1>How answer engines fetch your pages</h1>
      <p>Content that should be extracted and quoted.</p>
    </article>
  </main>
  <aside><!-- related links --></aside>
  <footer><!-- legal, contact --></footer>
</body>

Reference

3 pt

✗

Heading levels are missing, duplicated, or skipped

0 H1 and 120 headings total.

Why it matters. Chunkers split long pages on heading boundaries and carry the nearest heading into each chunk's metadata. A page with no `h1`, several competing `h1`s, or levels that skip from `h2` to `h4` produces chunks whose topic labels do not match their text, so retrieval matches the wrong passage.
Fix. Give every page one `h1` that names its subject, then nest `h2` and `h3` without skipping levels. Make each heading describe the section beneath it in words a reader would search for, rather than a label like "Overview". Style with CSS instead of choosing heading levels for their font size, and never use a heading tag for a caption or a button.

<h1>Robots.txt rules for AI crawlers</h1>
<h2>Training crawlers</h2>
<h3>GPTBot</h3>
<h3>ClaudeBot</h3>
<h2>Retrieval and citation fetchers</h2>
<h3>OAI-SearchBot</h3>

Reference

3 pt

✓

Substantive text is present in the server-rendered HTML

11622 words of text are present in the raw HTML. Most AI fetchers do not run JavaScript.

9 pt

✓

Visible text makes up a healthy share of the HTML payload

Text is 29.9% of the 211 KB document; 3 KB is inline script.

4 pt

✓

Title is unique and describes the page in specific terms

Title is 26 characters: "Livescore - soccer results"

3 pt

✓

Meta description provides an author-written summary

Meta description is 115 characters.

2 pt

✓

Document language is declared on the html element

Declared language: en.

1 pt

Structure 8 / 20

✗

No JSON-LD structured data found on the page

No JSON-LD structured data on the homepage.

Why it matters. JSON-LD gives an answer engine typed facts (headline, author, dates, price, publisher) without inferring them from prose, and those fields populate the entity record a citation is attached to. With no structured data every attribute has to be guessed from text, and guesses are dropped when confidence is low.
Fix. Add one `<script type="application/ld+json">` block describing the page's primary entity, using the schema.org type that actually fits: `Article` or `NewsArticle`, `Product`, `Recipe`, `Event`, `FAQPage`, or `SoftwareApplication`. Populate the required properties for that type and make every value match visible page content. Prefer JSON-LD over microdata or RDFa, since it is the format the major crawlers document, and render it server-side so non-JavaScript fetchers see it.

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Article",
  "headline": "Allow AI answer engines in robots.txt",
  "description": "How to opt out of model training while staying citable.",
  "url": "https://example.com/blog/robots-for-ai",
  "mainEntityOfPage": {
    "@type": "WebPage",
    "@id": "https://example.com/blog/robots-for-ai"
  },
  "image": "https://example.com/images/robots-for-ai.png",
  "inLanguage": "en",
  "datePublished": "2026-02-11T09:00:00-05:00",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-04T14:20:00-04:00",
  "author": {
    "@type": "Person",
    "name": "Dana Reyes",
    "url": "https://example.com/authors/dana-reyes"
  },
  "publisher": {
    "@type": "Organization",
    "name": "Example",
    "url": "https://example.com",
    "logo": {
      "@type": "ImageObject",
      "url": "https://example.com/logo.png",
      "width": 512,
      "height": 512
    }
  }
}

Reference

7 pt

✗

Structured data is too generic for what the page is about

No entity types that answer engines consume.

Why it matters. Answer engines route by entity type: a `Product` node supplies price and availability, an `Article` node supplies author and dates, and a `FAQPage` node supplies question and answer pairs. A generic `WebPage` or `WebSite` node on a product or article page carries none of those fields, so the specific facts stay unavailable.
Fix. Replace bare `WebPage` and `WebSite` nodes with the most specific type that describes the page, and fill the properties that type defines. Use `@graph` to publish several linked nodes on one page, such as an `Article` whose `publisher` points at an `Organization` node by `@id`. Add `BreadcrumbList` for hierarchy and reuse the same `@id` values across pages so the entity resolves to one record.

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@graph": [
    {
      "@type": "Product",
      "@id": "https://example.com/products/widget#product",
      "name": "Widget Pro",
      "sku": "WGT-PRO-1",
      "brand": { "@type": "Brand", "name": "Example" },
      "offers": {
        "@type": "Offer",
        "url": "https://example.com/products/widget",
        "price": "49.00",
        "priceCurrency": "USD",
        "availability": "https://schema.org/InStock"
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
      "itemListElement": [
        { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Products", "item": "https://example.com/products" },
        { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Widget Pro" }
      ]
    }
  ]
}

Reference

4 pt

✗

Facts are only in prose, with no list or table structure

0 tables, 0 lists, 0 code blocks, 0 question headings.

Why it matters. Lists, tables with header cells, and definition lists survive HTML-to-text conversion as discrete rows a model can lift into an answer verbatim. The same facts written as a paragraph, or laid out with positioned `div`s, lose their row and column relationships during extraction.
Fix. Put specifications, comparisons, pricing, and steps into real `<table>` markup with `<caption>` and `<th scope>`, or into `<ul>`, `<ol>`, and `<dl>` elements. Do not simulate tables with `div` grids, and avoid images of tables, which carry no extractable text. Keep one fact per row or list item so a chunk stays meaningful on its own.

<table>
  <caption>AI fetcher purposes</caption>
  <thead>
    <tr><th scope="col">User agent</th><th scope="col">Purpose</th></tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr><td>GPTBot</td><td>Model training</td></tr>
    <tr><td>OAI-SearchBot</td><td>Retrieval and citation</td></tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

Reference

1 pt

✓

JSON-LD parses cleanly with recognised schema.org terms

All JSON-LD blocks parse cleanly.

3 pt

✓

Page declares a self-referential canonical URL

Canonical: https://www.livescore.cz/

3 pt

✓

XML sitemap is declared in robots.txt and returns 200

Sitemap found at http://www.livescore.cz/sitemap.xml.

2 pt

Attribution 1 / 15

✗

No /llms.txt index of canonical pages

No /llms.txt.

Why it matters. `/llms.txt` is a markdown file that points an assistant at the canonical pages for a site, so retrieval does not depend on which page a search happened to return. Its format is fixed: one `#` title, a `>` blockquote summary, then `##` sections of markdown links with short notes.
Fix. Publish `/llms.txt` as `text/plain` markdown: an `#` H1 with the project name, a `>` blockquote summary, optional plain paragraphs of context, then `##` sections whose bullets are `[title](absolute-url): note`. Link the pages you want quoted, put lower-priority links under an `## Optional` section, and prefer URLs that also serve clean markdown. Keep it generated from the same source as your sitemap so it does not drift, and remember it is a hint for assistants, not an access control mechanism.

# Example

> Example publishes reference documentation for the Widget API and guides for
> configuring crawler access.

Prefer the pages below over search results; each URL is canonical.

## Docs

- [Widget API reference](https://example.com/docs/api): endpoints, auth, limits.
- [Quickstart](https://example.com/docs/quickstart): first request in five minutes.

## Policies

- [Crawler policy](https://example.com/legal/crawlers): which agents we allow.

## Optional

- [Changelog](https://example.com/changelog): dated release notes.

Reference

4 pt

✗

No machine-readable author is attached to the page

No author or Person entity, which weakens the authority signals answer engines use.

Why it matters. An `author` property in structured data is what lets an answer engine name a person or organisation as the source and link the byline to a stable profile. A byline that exists only as styled text is not reliably associated with the document during extraction.
Fix. Add an `author` property to the page's `Article`, `BlogPosting`, or `NewsArticle` node, typed as `Person` or `Organization`, with a `name` and a `url` pointing at a real profile page. Give each author a stable `@id` and reuse it across posts so the entity consolidates. Keep the visible byline identical to the structured value, and avoid generic names such as "Admin" or "Staff Writer" where a real author exists.

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "BlogPosting",
  "headline": "Allow AI answer engines in robots.txt",
  "author": {
    "@type": "Person",
    "@id": "https://example.com/authors/dana-reyes#person",
    "name": "Dana Reyes",
    "url": "https://example.com/authors/dana-reyes",
    "jobTitle": "Infrastructure Engineer",
    "sameAs": ["https://github.com/danareyes"]
  }
}

Reference

3 pt

✗

No machine-readable published or modified date

No publication or modification dates in structured data.

Why it matters. Answer engines prefer recent sources for questions about current state and use `dateModified` to decide whether a cached copy needs refetching. With no machine-readable date the page is treated as undated and loses to competitors that publish one.
Fix. Publish `datePublished` and `dateModified` in the page's structured data as ISO 8601 values with a timezone offset. Update `dateModified` only when the content actually changes, since bumping it on every deploy trains crawlers to ignore it. Mirror the value in a visible `<time datetime>` element so the rendered text and the metadata agree, and keep the sitemap `lastmod` consistent with it.

<time datetime="2026-08-04T14:20:00-04:00">Updated August 4, 2026</time>

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Article",
  "headline": "Allow AI answer engines in robots.txt",
  "datePublished": "2026-02-11T09:00:00-05:00",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-04T14:20:00-04:00"
}
</script>

Reference

3 pt

✗

No Organization entity identifies the publisher

No Organization entity, so the brand is harder to resolve to a known entity.

Why it matters. An `Organization` node with `sameAs` links resolves your site to a single entity across knowledge graphs instead of leaving the publisher name as an ambiguous string. That resolution is what lets an assistant attribute an answer to your brand and reuse your name, logo, and contact details.
Fix. Publish one `Organization` node, usually on the home page, with `name`, `url`, `logo`, and `sameAs` pointing at the profiles that already describe you: Wikipedia or Wikidata, Crunchbase, LinkedIn, and your primary social accounts. Give it a stable `@id` such as `https://example.com/#organization` and reference that `@id` from each page's `publisher` property instead of repeating the block. Add `contactPoint` and `address` when they are public, and keep every value identical to what the site shows.

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "@id": "https://example.com/#organization",
  "name": "Example",
  "legalName": "Example Holdings, Inc.",
  "url": "https://example.com",
  "logo": {
    "@type": "ImageObject",
    "url": "https://example.com/logo.png",
    "width": 512,
    "height": 512
  },
  "sameAs": [
    "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q00000000",
    "https://www.linkedin.com/company/example",
    "https://github.com/example"
  ],
  "contactPoint": {
    "@type": "ContactPoint",
    "contactType": "customer support",
    "email": "support@example.com",
    "areaServed": "US",
    "availableLanguage": ["en"]
  }
}

Reference

3 pt

No machine-readable license or usage terms for the content

No licence declaration, so reuse terms are ambiguous.

Why it matters. A `license` property, or a linked terms page, states the reuse conditions in a place a crawler can read, rather than leaving them to be inferred. Where terms are unstated, some pipelines default to the more restrictive handling, which reduces how much of the text is quoted.
Fix. Add a `license` property to the page's structured data pointing at a specific license URL, such as a Creative Commons deed or your own terms page, and add `rel="license"` on the visible link. Use `usageInfo` for conditions that are not a standard license, such as attribution wording or an API-only clause. State the terms once, at a stable URL, and reference it from every page rather than restating it per template.

<a rel="license" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">CC BY 4.0</a>

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Article",
  "headline": "Allow AI answer engines in robots.txt",
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "usageInfo": "https://example.com/legal/content-reuse",
  "creditText": "Example, crawlcensus research desk"
}
</script>

Reference

2 pt

Evidence raw measurements

robots.txt

Size: 936 bytes
Groups: 20
Sitemaps: http://www.livescore.cz/sitemap.xml

View the file as our crawler received it

Sitemap: http://www.livescore.cz/sitemap.xml

User-agent: *
Disallow: /standings/
Disallow: /draw/
Disallow: /newsfeed/
Disallow: /match/
Disallow: */x/js/browsercompatibility*.js

User-agent: SmartViper
Disallow: /

User-agent: Mediapartners-Google
Disallow: /standings/
Disallow: /draw/
Disallow: /x/
Allow: /match/

User-agent: CCBot
Disallow: /

User-agent: Omgilibot
Disallow: /

User-agent: Omgili
Disallow: /

User-agent: FacebookBot
Disallow: /

User-agent: Meta-ExternalAgent
Disallow: /

User-agent: Meta-ExternalFetcher
Disallow: /

User-agent: Diffbot
Disallow: /

User-agent: DuckAssistBot
Disallow: /

User-agent: AI2Bot
Disallow: /

User-agent: Bytespider
Disallow: /

User-agent: ImagesiftBot
Disallow: /

User-agent: Kangaroo Bot
Disallow: /

User-agent: cohere-ai
Disallow: /

User-agent: Timpibot
Disallow: /

User-agent: Webzio-Extended
Disallow: /

User-agent: YouBot
Disallow: /

User-agent: AmazonAdBot
Allow: /

Machine-readable extras

llms.txt: absent
ai.txt: absent
Sitemap: http://www.livescore.cz/sitemap.xml
Feeds: none
Schema types: none
Edge: Cloudflare
Final URL: https://www.livescore.cz/
HTML size: 211 KB, 11,622 words of text

Publish the score free

Sites that score well embed the badge. It links back to this live report, which re-measures on every scan.

<a href="https://crawlcensus.com/site/livescore.cz"><img src="https://crawlcensus.com/badge/livescore.cz.svg" alt="AI access score for livescore.cz" width="150" height="20"></a>

Track changes on this domain pro

Crawler policy is edited quietly. We re-scan monitored domains daily, keep the history, and email you the moment a crawler is blocked or unblocked, an llms.txt appears, or the score moves.

One address, unlimited domains during the beta. No newsletter, only change alerts.