Head to head

63cj.com vs sivuket.com

63cj.com is more readable to AI, 55 against 46 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

63cj.com 55/1005563cj.com

Scanned 3 hours ago · full report

sivuket.com 46/10046sivuket.com

Scanned 3 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimension63cj.comsivuket.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4039 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
8 / 250 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
3 / 203 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurement63cj.comsivuket.com
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked00
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript100
Structured datanono
Sitemapnono
llms.txtnono

63cj.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

sivuket.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.