Head to head

789bingo.com vs listennotes.com

listennotes.com is more readable to AI, 92 against 66 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

789bingo.com 66/10066789bingo.com

Scanned 10 minutes ago · full report

listennotes.com 92/10092listennotes.com

Scanned 10 minutes ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimension789bingo.comlistennotes.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
7 / 2519 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
14 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 158 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurement789bingo.comlistennotes.com
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked01
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript28619
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnoyes

789bingo.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

listennotes.com blocks CCBot, SemrushBot-OCOB.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.