Head to head

alexisboro.com vs ycharts.com

ycharts.com is more readable to AI, 87 against 82 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

alexisboro.com 82/10082alexisboro.com

Scanned 3 hours ago · full report

ycharts.com 87/10087ycharts.com

Scanned 3 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionalexisboro.comycharts.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4039 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
16 / 2521 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 2018 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
6 / 154 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementalexisboro.comycharts.com
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked70
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript1,3071,293
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtnono

alexisboro.com blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

ycharts.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.