Head to head

ancestry.com.au vs uts.edu.au

uts.edu.au is more readable to AI, 76 against 58 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

ancestry.com.au 58/10058ancestry.com.au

Scanned 4 hours ago · full report

uts.edu.au 76/10076uts.edu.au

Scanned 4 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionancestry.com.auuts.edu.au
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
24 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
21 / 2522 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
9 / 209 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementancestry.com.auuts.edu.au
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked10
Refuses AI agents at the edgeyesno
Words of text without JavaScript3,7171,105
Structured datanono
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

ancestry.com.au blocks Google-Extended.

uts.edu.au blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.