Head to head

aol.co.uk vs bristolpost.co.uk

aol.co.uk is more readable to AI, 66 against 47 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

aol.co.uk 66/10066aol.co.uk

Scanned 21 hours ago · full report

bristolpost.co.uk 47/10047bristolpost.co.uk

Scanned 19 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionaol.co.ukbristolpost.co.uk
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
36 / 4037 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
19 / 251 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
6 / 205 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementaol.co.ukbristolpost.co.uk
Answer engines blocked43
Training crawlers blocked115
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript2,0220
Structured datanono
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.