Head to head
artnews.com vs polygonscan.com
polygonscan.com is more readable to AI, 69 against 45 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.
Scanned 54 minutes ago · full report
Scanned 2 hours ago · full report
Where the difference is by dimension
| Dimension | artnews.com | polygonscan.com |
|---|---|---|
| Reach Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h… |
31 / 40 | 39 / 40 |
| Readability Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex… |
5 / 25 | 21 / 25 |
| Structure Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact… |
5 / 20 | 4 / 20 |
| Attribution Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and… |
1 / 15 | 1 / 15 |
The measurements side by side
| Measurement | artnews.com | polygonscan.com |
|---|---|---|
| Answer engines blocked | 6 | 0 |
| Training crawlers blocked | 12 | 0 |
| Refuses AI agents at the edge | yes | no |
| Words of text without JavaScript | 10 | 692 |
| Structured data | no | no |
| Sitemap | yes | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
artnews.com blocks anthropic-ai, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ChatGPT-User, ClaudeBot, cohere-ai, Diffbot, FacebookBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent, Meta-ExternalFetcher, OAI-SearchBot, omgili, omgilibot, PerplexityBot, Timpibot, YouBot.
polygonscan.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.
Compare your own site
Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.