Head to head

aso-bo.com vs amnt-16d09m20y.com

aso-bo.com is more readable to AI, 70 against 28 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

aso-bo.com 70/10070aso-bo.com

Scanned 12 hours ago · full report

amnt-16d09m20y.com 28/10028amnt-16d09m20y.com

Scanned 12 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionaso-bo.comamnt-16d09m20y.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4023 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
19 / 250 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
6 / 203 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementaso-bo.comamnt-16d09m20y.com
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked07
Refuses AI agents at the edgenoyes
Words of text without JavaScript850
Structured datanono
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtnono

aso-bo.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

amnt-16d09m20y.com blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.