Head to head

atgtickets.com vs testnav.com

atgtickets.com is more readable to AI, 69 against 56 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

atgtickets.com 69/10069atgtickets.com

Scanned 21 hours ago · full report

testnav.com 56/10056testnav.com

Scanned 21 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionatgtickets.comtestnav.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
38 / 4039 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
17 / 259 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
9 / 204 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementatgtickets.comtestnav.com
Answer engines blocked10
Training crawlers blocked70
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript2,21470
Structured datanono
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtnono

atgtickets.com blocks Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, cohere-ai, Diffbot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

testnav.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.