Head to head

blu-ray.com vs punchh.com

punchh.com is more readable to AI, 86 against 69 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

blu-ray.com 69/10069blu-ray.com

Scanned 3 hours ago · full report

punchh.com 86/10086punchh.com

Scanned 3 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionblu-ray.compunchh.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
37 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
18 / 2518 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
9 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 156 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementblu-ray.compunchh.com
Answer engines blocked20
Training crawlers blocked80
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript6,0141,491
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

blu-ray.com blocks Amazonbot, Bytespider, CCBot, Claude-SearchBot, ClaudeBot, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent, Meta-WebIndexer, omgili, omgilibot, SemrushBot-OCOB.

punchh.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.