Head to head

canberratimes.com.au vs foxsports.com.au

foxsports.com.au is more readable to AI, 75 against 72 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

canberratimes.com.au 72/10072canberratimes.com.au

Scanned 23 hours ago · full report

foxsports.com.au 75/10075foxsports.com.au

Scanned 18 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensioncanberratimes.com.aufoxsports.com.au
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
33 / 4039 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
15 / 2521 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 209 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
4 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementcanberratimes.com.aufoxsports.com.au
Answer engines blocked82
Training crawlers blocked92
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript4,0594,143
Structured datayesno
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.