Head to head

catholicnewsagency.com vs sexyvideoindian.com

sexyvideoindian.com is more readable to AI, 87 against 86 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

catholicnewsagency.com 86/10086catholicnewsagency.com

Scanned 1 day ago · full report

sexyvideoindian.com 87/10087sexyvideoindian.com

Scanned 1 day ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensioncatholicnewsagency.comsexyvideoindian.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
19 / 2521 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
18 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
10 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementcatholicnewsagency.comsexyvideoindian.com
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked70
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript4,275490
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnono

catholicnewsagency.com blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

sexyvideoindian.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.