Head to head

christianitytoday.com vs flodesk.com

flodesk.com is more readable to AI, 88 against 85 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

christianitytoday.com 85/10085christianitytoday.com

Scanned 3 hours ago · full report

flodesk.com 88/10088flodesk.com

Scanned 3 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionchristianitytoday.comflodesk.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
33 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
23 / 2520 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 2017 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
10 / 156 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementchristianitytoday.comflodesk.com
Answer engines blocked50
Training crawlers blocked80
Refuses AI agents at the edgeyesno
Words of text without JavaScript2,115839
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtnoyes

christianitytoday.com blocks anthropic-ai, Bytespider, CCBot, ChatGPT-User, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User, ClaudeBot, Diffbot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, omgili, omgilibot, PerplexityBot, YouBot.

flodesk.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.