Head to head

city-data.com vs podomatic.com

podomatic.com is more readable to AI, 72 against 49 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

city-data.com 49/10049city-data.com

Scanned 7 hours ago · full report

podomatic.com 72/10072podomatic.com

Scanned 6 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensioncity-data.compodomatic.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
34 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
11 / 2521 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
3 / 206 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementcity-data.compodomatic.com
Answer engines blocked20
Training crawlers blocked120
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript26476
Structured datanono
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnono

city-data.com blocks Amazonbot, anthropic-ai, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, cohere-ai, Diffbot, FacebookBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, ImagesiftBot, Meta-ExternalAgent, omgili, omgilibot, PerplexityBot.

podomatic.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.