Head to head

click2houston.com vs jigsy.com

click2houston.com is more readable to AI, 86 against 74 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

click2houston.com 86/10086click2houston.com

Scanned 1 day ago · full report

jigsy.com 74/10074jigsy.com

Scanned 1 day ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionclick2houston.comjigsy.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
21 / 2521 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
18 / 206 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
6 / 153 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementclick2houston.comjigsy.com
Answer engines blocked10
Training crawlers blocked40
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript4,504339
Structured datayesno
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnoyes

click2houston.com blocks Amazonbot, Amzn-SearchBot, Bytespider, GPTBot, SemrushBot-OCOB.

jigsy.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.