Head to head

cloudwindow-route.com vs smokva.com

smokva.com is more readable to AI, 92 against 82 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

cloudwindow-route.com 82/10082cloudwindow-route.com

Scanned 17 hours ago · full report

smokva.com 92/10092smokva.com

Scanned 17 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensioncloudwindow-route.comsmokva.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4039 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
25 / 2522 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
13 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 157 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementcloudwindow-route.comsmokva.com
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked07
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript1,707552
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnoyes

cloudwindow-route.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

smokva.com blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.