Head to head

cnn.co.jp vs seesaawiki.jp

cnn.co.jp is more readable to AI, 65 against 55 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

cnn.co.jp 65/10065cnn.co.jp

Scanned 15 hours ago · full report

seesaawiki.jp 55/10055seesaawiki.jp

Scanned 15 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensioncnn.co.jpseesaawiki.jp
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
37 / 4024 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
16 / 2518 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
7 / 209 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementcnn.co.jpseesaawiki.jp
Answer engines blocked30
Training crawlers blocked80
Refuses AI agents at the edgenoyes
Words of text without JavaScript237129
Structured datanono
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnono

cnn.co.jp blocks anthropic-ai, Applebot-Extended, CCBot, ChatGPT-User, ClaudeBot, cohere-ai, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent, omgili, omgilibot, PerplexityBot.

seesaawiki.jp blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.