Head to head

cotilleando.com vs shabakngy.com

cotilleando.com is more readable to AI, 70 against 62 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

cotilleando.com 70/10070cotilleando.com

Scanned 3 hours ago · full report

shabakngy.com 62/10062shabakngy.com

Scanned 3 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensioncotilleando.comshabakngy.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
35 / 4024 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
22 / 2516 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
9 / 2016 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 154 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementcotilleando.comshabakngy.com
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked70
Refuses AI agents at the edgeyesyes
Words of text without JavaScript1,250476
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtnono

cotilleando.com blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

shabakngy.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.