Head to head

crowdworks.jp vs macaro-ni.jp

macaro-ni.jp is more readable to AI, 78 against 58 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

crowdworks.jp 58/10058crowdworks.jp

Scanned 1 day ago · full report

macaro-ni.jp 78/10078macaro-ni.jp

Scanned 1 day ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensioncrowdworks.jpmacaro-ni.jp
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
7 / 2515 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
8 / 2018 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementcrowdworks.jpmacaro-ni.jp
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked30
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript4221
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

crowdworks.jp blocks ClaudeBot, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

macaro-ni.jp blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.