Head to head

csoonline.com vs etix.com

csoonline.com is more readable to AI, 78 against 45 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

csoonline.com 78/10078csoonline.com

Scanned 1 hour ago · full report

etix.com 45/10045etix.com

Scanned 1 hour ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensioncsoonline.cometix.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
34 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
20 / 251 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 203 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
4 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementcsoonline.cometix.com
Answer engines blocked20
Training crawlers blocked150
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript1,9830
Structured datayesno
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtnono

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.