Head to head

danatoto72.com vs tcdb.com

danatoto72.com is more readable to AI, 84 against 56 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

danatoto72.com 84/10084danatoto72.com

Scanned 3 hours ago · full report

tcdb.com 56/10056tcdb.com

Scanned 3 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensiondanatoto72.comtcdb.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
38 / 4024 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
22 / 2524 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
17 / 204 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
7 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementdanatoto72.comtcdb.com
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked70
Refuses AI agents at the edgenoyes
Words of text without JavaScript24,72518,714
Structured datayesno
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtnono

danatoto72.com blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

tcdb.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.