Head to head

diariovasco.com vs journaldunet.com

journaldunet.com is more readable to AI, 89 against 84 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

diariovasco.com 84/10084diariovasco.com

Scanned 18 hours ago · full report

journaldunet.com 89/10089journaldunet.com

Scanned 18 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensiondiariovasco.comjournaldunet.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
36 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
21 / 2520 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
18 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
7 / 154 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementdiariovasco.comjournaldunet.com
Answer engines blocked70
Training crawlers blocked81
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript4,430649
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.