Head to head

eauctionsindia.com vs e-personam.com

eauctionsindia.com is more readable to AI, 68 against 49 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

eauctionsindia.com 68/10068eauctionsindia.com

Scanned 15 hours ago · full report

e-personam.com 49/10049e-personam.com

Scanned 15 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensioneauctionsindia.come-personam.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
23 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
22 / 252 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
18 / 203 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementeauctionsindia.come-personam.com
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked70
Refuses AI agents at the edgeyesno
Words of text without JavaScript8252
Structured datayesno
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtnono

eauctionsindia.com blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

e-personam.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.