Head to head

etix.com vs csoonline.com

csoonline.com is more readable to AI, 85 against 48 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

etix.com 48/10048etix.com

Scanned 7 hours ago · full report

csoonline.com 85/10085csoonline.com

Scanned 7 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionetix.comcsoonline.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4036 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
1 / 2520 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
3 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 154 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementetix.comcsoonline.com
Answer engines blocked02
Training crawlers blocked015
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript01,983
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnono

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.