Head to head

etymonline.com vs bright-sdk.com

bright-sdk.com is more readable to AI, 88 against 70 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

etymonline.com 70/10070etymonline.com

Scanned 7 hours ago · full report

bright-sdk.com 88/10088bright-sdk.com

Scanned 7 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionetymonline.combright-sdk.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
17 / 2519 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
9 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 156 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementetymonline.combright-sdk.com
Answer engines blocked10
Training crawlers blocked30
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript2001,005
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

etymonline.com blocks CCBot, ChatGPT-User, ClaudeBot, GPTBot, SemrushBot-OCOB.

bright-sdk.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.