Head to head

exness.com vs diepresse.com

diepresse.com is more readable to AI, 80 against 75 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

exness.com 75/10075exness.com

Scanned 4 hours ago · full report

diepresse.com 80/10080diepresse.com

Scanned 4 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionexness.comdiepresse.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
24 / 4036 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
22 / 2519 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 2016 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
7 / 154 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementexness.comdiepresse.com
Answer engines blocked04
Training crawlers blocked011
Refuses AI agents at the edgeyesno
Words of text without JavaScript1,3641,457
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

exness.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

diepresse.com blocks anthropic-ai, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ChatGPT-User, ClaudeBot, cohere-ai, Diffbot, FacebookBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, ImagesiftBot, omgili, omgilibot, PerplexityBot, YouBot.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.