Head to head

fb77.one vs kuronavi.one

kuronavi.one is more readable to AI, 87 against 50 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

fb77.one 50/10050fb77.one

Scanned 10 minutes ago · full report

kuronavi.one 87/10087kuronavi.one

Scanned 9 minutes ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionfb77.onekuronavi.one
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
37 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
7 / 2523 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
3 / 2018 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 154 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementfb77.onekuronavi.one
Answer engines blocked40
Training crawlers blocked100
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript5409
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapnono
llms.txtnono

fb77.one blocks Amazonbot, anthropic-ai, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ChatGPT-User, ClaudeBot, cohere-ai, Google-Extended, GPTBot, ImagesiftBot, omgili, omgilibot, PerplexityBot, YouBot.

kuronavi.one blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.