Head to head

federalnewsnetwork.com vs sitelutions.com

federalnewsnetwork.com is more readable to AI, 87 against 74 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

federalnewsnetwork.com 87/10087federalnewsnetwork.com

Scanned 6 hours ago · full report

sitelutions.com 74/10074sitelutions.com

Scanned 6 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionfederalnewsnetwork.comsitelutions.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
36 / 4039 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
22 / 2520 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 209 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
4 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementfederalnewsnetwork.comsitelutions.com
Answer engines blocked60
Training crawlers blocked100
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript1,5401,532
Structured datayesno
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

federalnewsnetwork.com blocks anthropic-ai, Bytespider, CCBot, ChatGPT-User, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User, ClaudeBot, cohere-ai, Diffbot, FacebookBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, ImagesiftBot, omgili, omgilibot, PerplexityBot, YouBot.

sitelutions.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.