Head to head

filipinocupid.com vs nezavisne.com

nezavisne.com is more readable to AI, 75 against 64 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

filipinocupid.com 64/10064filipinocupid.com

Scanned 1 hour ago · full report

nezavisne.com 75/10075nezavisne.com

Scanned 1 hour ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionfilipinocupid.comnezavisne.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
34 / 4031 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
20 / 2519 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
9 / 2018 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 157 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementfilipinocupid.comnezavisne.com
Answer engines blocked04
Training crawlers blocked06
Refuses AI agents at the edgeyesyes
Words of text without JavaScript570922
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtnono

filipinocupid.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

nezavisne.com blocks anthropic-ai, Bytespider, CCBot, ChatGPT-User, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent, OAI-SearchBot, Perplexity-User, PerplexityBot.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.