Head to head

flourish.studio vs sex-studentki.studio

flourish.studio is more readable to AI, 91 against 69 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

flourish.studio 91/10091flourish.studio

Scanned 13 hours ago · full report

sex-studentki.studio 69/10069sex-studentki.studio

Scanned 13 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionflourish.studiosex-studentki.studio
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
37 / 4039 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
20 / 2518 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 207 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
11 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementflourish.studiosex-studentki.studio
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked140
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript8082,468
Structured datayesno
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtyesno

flourish.studio blocks AI2Bot, anthropic-ai, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Diffbot, FacebookBot, GPTBot, ImagesiftBot, Meta-ExternalAgent, omgili, omgilibot, Scrapy, Timpibot.

sex-studentki.studio blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.