Head to head

gamblingcommission.gov.uk vs mangabuddy1.co.uk

mangabuddy1.co.uk is more readable to AI, 85 against 80 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

gamblingcommission.gov.uk 80/10080gamblingcommission.gov.uk

Scanned 17 hours ago · full report

mangabuddy1.co.uk 85/10085mangabuddy1.co.uk

Scanned 17 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensiongamblingcommission.gov.ukmangabuddy1.co.uk
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4039 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
25 / 2521 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
9 / 2017 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 154 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementgamblingcommission.gov.ukmangabuddy1.co.uk
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked06
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript1,0701,110
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

gamblingcommission.gov.uk blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

mangabuddy1.co.uk blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.