Head to head

gazo-chat.net vs xn--h-k9tybb8g5ivhkczry701afhpm4sru6d.net

gazo-chat.net is more readable to AI, 66 against 65 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

gazo-chat.net 66/10066gazo-chat.net

Scanned 15 hours ago · full report

xn--h-k9tybb8g5ivhkczry701a… 65/10065xn--h-k9tybb8g5ivhkczry701a…

Scanned 15 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensiongazo-chat.netxn--h-k9tybb8g5ivhkczry701afhpm4sru6d.net
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
18 / 2516 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
4 / 204 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementgazo-chat.netxn--h-k9tybb8g5ivhkczry701afhpm4sru6d.net
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked00
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript398274
Structured datanono
Sitemapnono
llms.txtnono

gazo-chat.net blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

xn--h-k9tybb8g5ivhkczry701afhpm4sru6d.net blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.