Head to head

geograph.org.uk vs host-it.co.uk

geograph.org.uk is more readable to AI, 78 against 74 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

geograph.org.uk 78/10078geograph.org.uk

Scanned 4 hours ago · full report

host-it.co.uk 74/10074host-it.co.uk

Scanned 4 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensiongeograph.org.ukhost-it.co.uk
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
36 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
21 / 2524 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
18 / 209 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
3 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementgeograph.org.ukhost-it.co.uk
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked120
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript527548
Structured datayesno
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtyesno

geograph.org.uk blocks Amazonbot, anthropic-ai, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GoogleOther, GPTBot, ImagesiftBot, Meta-ExternalAgent, SemrushBot-OCOB, Timpibot.

host-it.co.uk blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.