Head to head

go-optic.com vs wy916.com

go-optic.com is more readable to AI, 92 against 61 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

go-optic.com 92/10092go-optic.com

Scanned 12 hours ago · full report

wy916.com 61/10061wy916.com

Scanned 12 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensiongo-optic.comwy916.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4039 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
24 / 2514 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 204 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
7 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementgo-optic.comwy916.com
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked00
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript1,814253
Structured datayesno
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtnono

go-optic.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

wy916.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.