Head to head

golfgenius.com vs tracfone.com

tracfone.com is more readable to AI, 86 against 80 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

golfgenius.com 80/10080golfgenius.com

Scanned 20 hours ago · full report

tracfone.com 86/10086tracfone.com

Scanned 20 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensiongolfgenius.comtracfone.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
32 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
21 / 2519 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
18 / 2018 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
7 / 154 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementgolfgenius.comtracfone.com
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked10
Refuses AI agents at the edgeyesno
Words of text without JavaScript7893,776
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnono

golfgenius.com blocks SemrushBot-OCOB.

tracfone.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.