Head to head

gov-online.go.jp vs ricoh.co.jp

ricoh.co.jp is more readable to AI, 69 against 60 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

gov-online.go.jp 60/10060gov-online.go.jp

Scanned 55 minutes ago · full report

ricoh.co.jp 69/10069ricoh.co.jp

Scanned 3 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensiongov-online.go.jpricoh.co.jp
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all, in rob…
33 / 4039 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
19 / 2522 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
7 / 207 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementgov-online.go.jpricoh.co.jp
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked00
Refuses AI agents at the edgeyesno
Words of text without JavaScript787499
Structured datanono
Sitemapnono
llms.txtnono

gov-online.go.jp blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

ricoh.co.jp blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.