Head to head

gq-magazin.de vs ariva.de

ariva.de is more readable to AI, 84 against 83 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

gq-magazin.de 83/10083gq-magazin.de

Scanned 10 hours ago · full report

ariva.de 84/10084ariva.de

Scanned 10 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensiongq-magazin.deariva.de
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
34 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
21 / 2517 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
3 / 153 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementgq-magazin.deariva.de
Answer engines blocked100
Training crawlers blocked110
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript1,7032,251
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.