Head to head

heraldscotland.com vs hearstnetworks.com

hearstnetworks.com is more readable to AI, 79 against 72 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

heraldscotland.com 72/10072heraldscotland.com

Scanned 22 hours ago · full report

hearstnetworks.com 79/10079hearstnetworks.com

Scanned 22 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionheraldscotland.comhearstnetworks.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
32 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
22 / 2525 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
13 / 209 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementheraldscotland.comhearstnetworks.com
Answer engines blocked120
Training crawlers blocked182
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript1,219652
Structured datayesno
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.