Head to head

hessenschau.de vs uni-jena.de

uni-jena.de is more readable to AI, 92 against 87 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

hessenschau.de 87/10087hessenschau.de

Scanned 1 hour ago · full report

uni-jena.de 92/10092uni-jena.de

Scanned 1 hour ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionhessenschau.deuni-jena.de
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
37 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
23 / 2525 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
18 / 2018 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
4 / 157 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementhessenschau.deuni-jena.de
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked120
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript2,8971,153
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

hessenschau.de blocks Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, cohere-training-data-crawler, Diffbot, FacebookBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent, omgili, omgilibot, PanguBot.

uni-jena.de blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.