Head to head

hosting-australia.com vs edmontonjournal.com

hosting-australia.com is more readable to AI, 89 against 74 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

hosting-australia.com 89/10089hosting-australia.com

Scanned 14 hours ago · full report

edmontonjournal.com 74/10074edmontonjournal.com

Scanned 14 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionhosting-australia.comedmontonjournal.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4024 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
21 / 2523 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
9 / 156 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementhosting-australia.comedmontonjournal.com
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked02
Refuses AI agents at the edgenoyes
Words of text without JavaScript3,4242,394
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

hosting-australia.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

edmontonjournal.com blocks omgili, omgilibot.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.