Head to head

hot-chilli.net vs beatstars.net

hot-chilli.net is more readable to AI, 88 against 45 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

hot-chilli.net 88/10088hot-chilli.net

Scanned 12 hours ago · full report

beatstars.net 45/10045beatstars.net

Scanned 12 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionhot-chilli.netbeatstars.net
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4032 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
20 / 254 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 205 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
6 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementhot-chilli.netbeatstars.net
Answer engines blocked02
Training crawlers blocked014
Refuses AI agents at the edgenoyes
Words of text without JavaScript45715
Structured datayesno
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.