Head to head

idw-online.de vs freiepresse.de

freiepresse.de is more readable to AI, 82 against 62 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

idw-online.de 62/10062idw-online.de

Scanned 4 hours ago · full report

freiepresse.de 82/10082freiepresse.de

Scanned 4 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionidw-online.defreiepresse.de
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4035 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
17 / 2520 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
4 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 157 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementidw-online.defreiepresse.de
Answer engines blocked06
Training crawlers blocked05
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript2,0849,932
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnono

idw-online.de blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

freiepresse.de blocks Amazonbot, Bytespider, CCBot, ChatGPT-User, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, Perplexity-User, PerplexityBot.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.