Head to head

jktank.net vs satta143.net

satta143.net is more readable to AI, 69 against 56 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

jktank.net 56/10056jktank.net

Scanned 14 hours ago · full report

satta143.net 69/10069satta143.net

Scanned 11 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionjktank.netsatta143.net
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4032 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
12 / 2518 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
3 / 2018 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementjktank.netsatta143.net
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked07
Refuses AI agents at the edgenoyes
Words of text without JavaScript1804,070
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnono

jktank.net blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

satta143.net blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.