Head to head

jofogas.hu vs mediacenter.hu

jofogas.hu is more readable to AI, 70 against 67 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

jofogas.hu 70/10070jofogas.hu

Scanned 1 hour ago · full report

mediacenter.hu 67/10067mediacenter.hu

Scanned 1 hour ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionjofogas.humediacenter.hu
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
30 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
19 / 2519 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
17 / 207 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
4 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementjofogas.humediacenter.hu
Answer engines blocked40
Training crawlers blocked70
Refuses AI agents at the edgeyesno
Words of text without JavaScript7761,071
Structured datayesno
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtnono

jofogas.hu blocks anthropic-ai, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ChatGPT-User, ClaudeBot, cohere-ai, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent, OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot.

mediacenter.hu blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.