Head to head

kyoto-np.co.jp vs sumo.or.jp

kyoto-np.co.jp is more readable to AI, 87 against 64 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

kyoto-np.co.jp 87/10087kyoto-np.co.jp

Scanned 18 hours ago · full report

sumo.or.jp 64/10064sumo.or.jp

Scanned 18 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionkyoto-np.co.jpsumo.or.jp
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
39 / 4039 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
22 / 2517 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 204 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementkyoto-np.co.jpsumo.or.jp
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked00
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript736933
Structured datayesno
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtnono

kyoto-np.co.jp blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

sumo.or.jp blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.