Head to head

mailgun.com vs amnt-16d09m20y.com

mailgun.com is more readable to AI, 86 against 28 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

mailgun.com 86/10086mailgun.com

Scanned 11 hours ago · full report

amnt-16d09m20y.com 28/10028amnt-16d09m20y.com

Scanned 11 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionmailgun.comamnt-16d09m20y.com
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4023 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
18 / 250 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 203 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
6 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementmailgun.comamnt-16d09m20y.com
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked07
Refuses AI agents at the edgenoyes
Words of text without JavaScript1,0530
Structured datayesno
Sitemapyesno
llms.txtnono

mailgun.com blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

amnt-16d09m20y.com blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.