Head to head

mbs.jp vs vektor-inc.co.jp

vektor-inc.co.jp is more readable to AI, 81 against 73 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

mbs.jp 73/10073mbs.jp

Scanned 1 day ago · full report

vektor-inc.co.jp 81/10081vektor-inc.co.jp

Scanned 1 day ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionmbs.jpvektor-inc.co.jp
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
21 / 2517 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
7 / 2018 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementmbs.jpvektor-inc.co.jp
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked00
Refuses AI agents at the edgenono
Words of text without JavaScript3181,047
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapnoyes
llms.txtnono

mbs.jp blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

vektor-inc.co.jp blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.