Head to head

mediamatters.org vs ixdf.org

ixdf.org is more readable to AI, 90 against 73 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

mediamatters.org 73/10073mediamatters.org

Scanned 15 hours ago · full report

ixdf.org 90/10090ixdf.org

Scanned 15 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionmediamatters.orgixdf.org
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
36 / 4038 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
22 / 2522 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
9 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 154 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementmediamatters.orgixdf.org
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked07
Refuses AI agents at the edgeyesno
Words of text without JavaScript1,0502,058
Structured datanoyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

mediamatters.org blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

ixdf.org blocks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.