Head to head

mein-schoener-garten.de vs poppen.de

poppen.de is more readable to AI, 88 against 78 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

mein-schoener-garten.de 78/10078mein-schoener-garten.de

Scanned 17 hours ago · full report

poppen.de 88/10088poppen.de

Scanned 17 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionmein-schoener-garten.depoppen.de
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
30 / 4040 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
19 / 2521 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
20 / 2020 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
4 / 153 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementmein-schoener-garten.depoppen.de
Answer engines blocked10
Training crawlers blocked70
Refuses AI agents at the edgeyesno
Words of text without JavaScript2,1862,187
Structured datayesyes
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

mein-schoener-garten.de blocks Amazonbot, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot, FacebookBot, Google-CloudVertexBot, GPTBot, Meta-ExternalAgent, Timpibot.

poppen.de blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.