Head to head

mentalhealth.org.uk vs mountain-portal.co.uk

mentalhealth.org.uk is more readable to AI, 79 against 53 out of 100. Both were measured with the same audit: robots.txt policy for 48 AI agents, live requests under four crawler user agents, and a JavaScript-free read of the homepage.

mentalhealth.org.uk 79/10079mentalhealth.org.uk

Scanned 18 hours ago · full report

mountain-portal.co.uk 53/10053mountain-portal.co.uk

Scanned 18 hours ago · full report

Where the difference is by dimension

Dimensionmentalhealth.org.ukmountain-portal.co.uk
Reach
Whether AI crawlers and answer-engine fetchers are permitted to request the page at all. What h…
40 / 4024 / 40
Readability
Whether a fetcher that does not execute JavaScript receives the actual content, in markup an ex…
24 / 2516 / 25
Structure
Machine-readable markup that states the page's type, entities, canonical URL, and discrete fact…
9 / 209 / 20
Attribution
Signals that let an answer engine name the author, date the content, resolve the publisher, and…
1 / 151 / 15

The measurements side by side

Measurementmentalhealth.org.ukmountain-portal.co.uk
Answer engines blocked00
Training crawlers blocked00
Refuses AI agents at the edgenoyes
Words of text without JavaScript776636
Structured datanono
Sitemapyesyes
llms.txtnono

mentalhealth.org.uk blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

mountain-portal.co.uk blocks no tracked AI crawler in robots.txt.

Compare your own site

Free, no account. To watch a competitor and get an email when their crawler policy changes, see pricing.